| D-Link DWL-520 Wireless PCI Adapter, 802.11b, 11Mbps |

enlarge
|
Model: DWL-520
Brand: D-Link
Manufacturer: D-Link
Average Rating:
(submit your review here)
Total Reviews: 24
Form factor: Plug-in card
Hardware platform: PC
Data link protocol: IEEE 802.11b
|
|
|
| |
| Features: |
Uses PCI interface Supports 11 Mbps, 5.5 Mbps, 2 Mbps, and 1 Mbps data rates with automatic fallback Up to 128-bit encryption Uses 2.4 GHz frequency and direct sequence spread spectrum technology Indoor range of up to 328 feet |
| |
| Description: |
| The D-Link Air DWL-520 is an IEEE 802.11b, Wi-Fi compatible wireless PCI adapter. The DWL-520 provides an integrated PCI solution that will operate within the 2.4 GHz Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) for wireless networks in the home or office environment. Along with the advanced wireless technology that is incorporated into the DWL-520, wide range motherboard support is assured by compliance to the latest PCI 2.2 standard interface. The DWL-520 is the solution for users and network administrators looking for the convenience offered by a wireless connection. The D-Link DWL-520 can operate in either Ad-Hoc mode (Peer-to-Peer networking without an access point) or Infrastructure mode (Peer-to-Peer networking using an access point). In Infrastructure mode, the DWL-520 can be connected to a wireless residential gateway with a broadband connection to enable wireless sharing of the High-speed Internet access. The DWL-520 can transmit data at rates of 11 Mbps, 5.5 Mbps, 2 Mbps and 1 Mbps per channel. With its detachable antenna using a reverse SMA connector, the DWL-520 has an effective range of up to 70 m for indoor use and up to 300 m in an outdoor environment. In addition, the DWL-520 supports 64/128-bit WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) Encryption for network security. |
| |
| User Reviews (24 total): |
Page 1 2 of Total 2 Pages
|
Not too stable, June 21, 2006
By user (joplin, MO)
i've been using this card for several months and if i have too many programs open at the same time, it disconnects & takes a while to reconnect. this never happened when i used wired-cable 'net. i use winxp & a motorola wireless modem/router combo and from reading the reviews, i think the problem is probably the card. im going to upgrade to a different brand.
|
BAD - no unix/linux support, March 10, 2005
By user
D-Link created a confusion out there in the market area, selling the wirelss adapters with diffrent chipset using the same name for them. The first models (version A and B) used to have Prism chipset from Intersil (which are supported by POSIX sistems) but now they changed thei chipset with other vendors like Realtek without changing the name of the product - that's how I bought this thinking it is spported - unfortunaltelly it is not !
|
Good value, December 30, 2004
By user (Dubai, UAE)
There's a lot of bad reviews here, and I don't doubt people's experience. For me however it's worked great. No problems setting up or using. Good value for the money (...). I'm using Windows Media Center 2005.
|
D-Link DWL-520, September 3, 2004
By user
Picked this NIC up because it was selling for a reasonable price. I am using it with a Netgear MR814 Wireless B Router. Have had no problems with it since. It is running on a generic Pentium-III running Windows 2000 Server. I did experience some of the slow-down effect reported (slow mouse movement) initially, but when I upgraded to the latest software, that seemed to solve the problem. This computer is upstairs, about 40 feet away from the router. I bought a second one and installed it on another server downstairs - a PowerEdge 400SC about 20 feet from the router running Win2K pro. Again, no problems and no dropped signals.
I get about 75% strength upstairs and 90% downstairs. It does not interfere with the Netgear wg511 that I am using with my laptop. If you're looking for an affordable, basic, wireless NIC, consider this one. I recommend installing the latest software from the website first to ensure compatibility.
|
Wireless Adapters, July 24, 2004
By user (Georgia, USA)
All of these negative reviews really surprised me. I have had this wireless adapter for over two months and it has not given me a bit of trouble. I have a home network, consisting of four desktops and a laptop. My network equipment consists of a Netgear router, 2 Linksys wireless PCI adapters, this D-Link wireless adapter, Netgear wireless card adapter, and a Linksys ethernet card. Of the three wireless adapters, this D-Link has been the most reliable. Let me add that this situation may have more to do with the operating system on those computers, rather than the Wireless adapters themselves. The Linksys adapters (WMP 11) are both installed on computers with the Windows XP Pro operating system. They give me constant trouble. They lose connection with the router on a regular basis. I noticed that this did not happen with a computer running Windows XP Home Edition that did not have the Windows XP Service Pack 1 installed. I am not alone in having this problem. There are plenty of people using Windows XP, with the Service Pack, that experienced the same problems. There is a possible fix in the microsoft knowledgebase. This D-Link adapter is installed on an old, Pentium III computer. This particular computer is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server, as well as Windows 2000 Pro in a dual-boot configuration. I have not experienced any difficulties with this system. None. I can find no fault with this adapter. Perhaps there are other factors that are causing the difficulties. I must admit that I have not explored the possibility of the Netgear router having a "preference". Unlikely, but perhaps possible. I would have preferred to have all my equipment come from the same vendor. However, given the situation, this D-Link adapter has been the most solid component of my mixed-vendor network. Since these reviews are based on our personal experience, and mine has been great, I would have to give this device a five-star rating. I will try and install the D-Link adapter on a desktop running Windows XP Pro, with the Service Pack installed, to see how it will perform.
|
Please do not support a business that does not offer support, July 16, 2004
By user
Me, like many others have the problems with the Blue Screen of Death, and an NMI Parity error. It has nothing to do with memory or anything else. There is a problem with the driver which D-Link have done nothing to remedy. They have been continously confronted with the problem, but does not offer any solutions except for one that solves the problem on a particular Compaq model.This company does not deserve any customers. Please buy another WLAN card.
|
another problem device, July 2, 2004
By user (Eugene, OR United States)
I echo other complaints about the DWL520. The connection is made with very good signal strength and quality. However, the device refuses to make any throughput. It would almost never successfully load a page. The irony is that I am using another Dlink product as the router. The 520 is a poor product.
|
Product is junk and tech support a joke., May 10, 2004
By user (Huntsville, AL United States)
Using this wirless network card dropped my internet download speed from 2700 Kbps to 1200 Kbps.That's with link quality of 100 and only one other computer on the network with no applications running on either computer (aside from the one browser window required for the test). Both computers had brand new DLink DWL-520 Wireless network cards operating into a new DLink DI-514 router. Following industry standards, DLink apparently mans their first echelon phones with technical illiterates who while capable of following a scripted check list, haven't a clue what's causing your problem or how their sequence of steps might might solve it. So, after numerous calls, multiple case IDs, and never talking to the same person twice, I decided it was best to cut my losses and give up before they reconfigured my computer to the point where it wouldn't work at all. If you surf the web a lot or do internet gaming, stay clear of DLink products. Stick with a reputable name and save yourself the aggravation and wasted hours trying to make cheap junk like this work. The money you save isn't worth the headaches.
|
Waste of time and money., April 13, 2004
By user (Lexington, KY USA)
DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, PURCHASE THIS CARDI bought this NIC at CompUSA for $40 and thought it would make a nice, low cost wireless card. This thing was a nightmare from start to finish. The configuration utility that comes with it is totally counterintuitive. Nothing is where you think it would be. After installation, it detected my wireless network just fine. Steady 80-90% signal strength with NINETY-FIVE PERCENT packet loss. The connection would be stable for two minutes at the most and then die. I tried different PCI slots, I tried different channels, I tried uninstalling and reinstalling the software... nothing worked. I called D-Link support multiple times and spoke to a totally clueless "technician" each time. They offered such pearls as "try a different router" and "try uninstalling your sound card". Please. There are plenty of other complaints online about this piece of junk. Don't bother buying this card. It's a complete joke.
|
Major software bug and NO customer support, March 3, 2004
By user
The 520+ "works"... for the most part. However, it has a fundamental software bug that causes an NMI memory parity error on shutdown causing your computer to freeze with a "blue screen" and error message. There is no way out of the freeze unless you unplug the computer. For Compaq's they have a workaround to their bug. You may... may... might be able to workaround their bug by diddling your system BIOS (always a fun adventure unless you botch up a keystroke). For HP (and possibly others) there is no workaround. You are stuck. Repeated emails to D-Link have yielded nothing, which says something about there customer "service". Stay away from D-Link unless you like pulling the power plug in and out on your computer. Poor, buggy software and NO customer service. Use and install at your own significant risk.
|
|
|
Drops Connections, Worthless Tech Support, January 15, 2004
By user
I made the mistake of buying a DWL-520 card and the DWL-514 router. Huge error. The card drops connections frequently and tech support has been unable to correct the problem. Check the internet -- I am far from the only one to have experienced this same problem. I am currently trying to get my money back. Run!
|
Poor software, worse performance..., January 13, 2004
By user
I bought this because it was cheap, but didn't realize it wouldn't really work. First of all, the software is a resource hog. It causes my mouse to stutter randomly, apparently due to one or more memory resident programs it uses. I *never* had any sort of trouble with other NICs I borrowed and tested out.Lastly, if you are attempting to connect to a Wireless Access Point that has SSID disabled you will not be able to access it with this card. The software forces you to enter something for the SSID. The only WAPs this appears to work out of the box with are, of course, D-Link. The funny part is the support article on their website acknowledges this issue, but provides an "answer" that is directly contradictory to the problem. Buyer beware. I'm returning mine tonight (minus 15% stocking fee) :(
|
Cheap price, cheap performance..., January 13, 2004
By user
I fell to the cheap temptation and bought this DWL-520(rev e) PCI card. It took me a few minutes to discover:- it will not connect to a Wireless Access Point that does not use SSID. It forces you to use an SSID of your own and if you don't it uses "default" which works fine with their hardware. This is completely moronic. Most WAPs/Routers offer a feature to turn off SSID and the designers of the software (card?) should know this. - tech support is especially cheap. The support article on their website that addresses the above HUGE problem completely contradicts itself and proves they don't know what is going on. - their software is big, cheap and caused my Windows 2000 system to stutter (erratic mouse movements ever few seconds, etc). Last week I borrowed a friend's Cisco 350 wireless card and had absolutely no problems. If you want a wireless card backed by quality hardware and software, expect to spend at least US$65. I'm taking mine back and spending twice as much on a Cisco 350.
|
Never Got it to Operate, January 3, 2004
By user (Ortonville, MI USA)
The one I bought is all packaged ready to go back to the store. It was cheaper than the Linksys, and I had used D-link NIC's before so I figured I would try it. Boy am I sorry. After 3-4 hours working on this thing I think I'm in 1986 again.Problem 1: None of the installation procedures followed the sequence of the printed instructions. I went through a constant questioning process of "where am I now?" and "what is it trying to say?" as I tried to translate their instructions said to what I was seeing. This problem was worse as I had to go through the process in part several times. Problem 2: There seems to be a problem with any install on a Windows XP system. Great. That's like having gasoline that works in anything but a Chevrolet. This is ultimately what my show-stopper was. Although I found the instructions on the web site and running back and forth between computers, worked my way through them, but, they don't work after you've done everything else in the instructions - you would have to do them DURING the install, meaning you would have to know that there was an XP problem in the first place. For the folks at D-Link: inability to operate with XP is useful information for a BUYING decision, not an installation. Problem 3: Tech support. Literature gives a 24x7 number which it is not. I made four calls total and had line suddenly go dead in two of them. Bottom line: I did have the card operating and on the network, but could not ping. I have no doubt tech support could have gotten me going within a few minutes if they were not busy doing the same for every other buyer. I would only buy this card if I were buying in quantity and had the time to figure out how to make the first one work, then could leverage that information.
|
Very happy with the DWL-520, December 30, 2003
By user (Los Angeles, CA United States)
I bought this card along with the D-Link DI-514 wireless router and am extremely pleased with my purchase. My son's room is about 60 feet away from where I have my Desktop PC, through several walls no less. But he now has a GREAT connection to both the Internet and my Desktop PC (and my printer) via the Network I was able to setup with this card. When I received the card, I installed it in the PC and ran the setup program, but it did not work. I called D-Link Technical Support, and the rep was very friendly and informed me that under Windows XP, I needed to flip a checkbox to let Windows know that the D-Link program would handle the connection. I did, and it worked. Then he helped me setup my network, something I never have done before. In 15 minutes, from start to finish, my son's room was connected! Now he can go to his video game websites on HIS time, and I can get some work done. And, he can print his homework on my printer, so I don't need to buy another. This is great! I highly recommend this product!
|
GNU/Linux Access Point, November 12, 2003
By user (Maple Shade, NJ USA)
I'm using the DWL-520 in my computer runnning Red Hat 9.0 and the HostAP driver. The card is acting as an access point. I get good connectivity between the DWL-520 and my laptop's Orinoco card. Oddly, I got poor connectivity between the DWL-520 and a D-Link router. I'm able to add an external antenna when needed. The card has a reverse gender SMA antenna connector.
|
Very Simple to Install and Runs Great!, November 6, 2003
By user
I installed this in my PC desktop so I didn't have to drag an Ethernet cable through walls and under carpet. I've had zero problems with the card installed in my Dell with Windows XP. D-Link provides good documentation and setup wizards that guide you through it all.
|
Frustratingly unreliable connection, May 19, 2003
By user
I got this card for pretty cheap ...so I guess I shouldn't be too surprised about its quality, but I would really recommend going with something else. I had reservations about buying this card considering my relatively poor experience with another D-Link wireless card (for my laptop), but I figured that range wouldn't be an issue this time because my computer was only going to be 20 feet away from the access point (I just didn't want to have the clutter of a cable running through the hallway). It turns out that when this card works, it works all right, but sporadically (about 25% of the total time on average for me), it just stops sending or receiving. Obviously, this is very frustrating. I'm not sure if it's an issue with the drivers or the hardware itself, but either way, I'd rather spend twice as much to get a card that works nearly 100% of the time.
|
Very nice range and compatibility, March 26, 2003
By user
I recently set one of these up for someone in an old K6/2-266 machine. Works great - 100% signal strength at ~30 feet through two walls a desk. Only supports 128bit encryption, unlike the 520+.My one gripe is that it needs a longer antenna. The one I recieved is smaller than the one pictured here and barely sticks out from the back of the case. Had to reorient the PC a bit to keep the signal from being blocked. What would be great is a short cable with an antenna that can clip to any part of the computer. Otherwise, get a RP-SMA antenna extension if your PC's back faces away from your WAP.
|
DWL-520 PCI adapter, January 3, 2003
By user
I purchased the DWL-520 with a DI-614+ wireless router to link 2 computers to a cable modem. The DWL-520 was easy to install and the drivers and software loaded without incident. It worked very well with the exception of the mouse hanging up after a few hours of inactivity. I downloaded the latest firmware for the DWL-520 off the Dlink support website. It was a little tricky having to unzip but if you use winzip and let the winzip wizard unzip and install, it goes a little easier. Once the new firmware was installed the mouse problem was resolved.
|
Page 1 2 of Total 2 Pages
|
|
| Copyright 2001-2008 NTReview.info |
|